2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0632-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-navigated Iliosacral Screw Insertion Reduces Malposition Rate and Radiation Exposure

Abstract: Insertion of percutaneous iliosacral screws with fluoroscopic guidance is associated with a relatively high screw malposition rate and long radiation exposure. We asked whether radiation exposure was reduced and screw position improved in patients having percutaneous iliosacral screw insertion using computer-assisted navigation compared with patients having conventional fluoroscopic screw placement. We inserted 26 screws in 24 patients using the navigation system and 35 screws in 32 patients using the conventi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
111
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
111
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with our data, even though the distribution of fracture severity was diVerent or could not be identiWed due to diVerent applied classiWcation systems. Although various techniques for CT-guided or computer-navigated screw insertion have been described [1,2,13,17,20,27], their use in the treatment of trauma patients is controversial. While higher precision of screw placement was described for computer-assisted surgery [2,20,27] others found no diVerence between navigated or CT-guided and conventional screw placement [1,17,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with our data, even though the distribution of fracture severity was diVerent or could not be identiWed due to diVerent applied classiWcation systems. Although various techniques for CT-guided or computer-navigated screw insertion have been described [1,2,13,17,20,27], their use in the treatment of trauma patients is controversial. While higher precision of screw placement was described for computer-assisted surgery [2,20,27] others found no diVerence between navigated or CT-guided and conventional screw placement [1,17,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advent of standardized intraoperative imaging algorithms [3,5,15], percutaneous screw placement has gained popularity allowing for minimally invasive early deWnitive Wxation of fractures and disruptions of the posterior pelvic ring. In order to increase precision of screw positioning, various techniques for CT-guided/computer-navigated screw positioning were described [13,27]. Yet, in the emergency room (ER) with patients in urgent need for early primary care, these time-consuming techniques are unsuitable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopic navigation systems using Iso-C3D, a mobile 3D C-arm equipped with an image intensifier, have been successfully validated for surgeries of the cervical [1][2][3][4][5][6], thoracic [3,[6][7][8][9] and lumbar [3,6,[10][11][12] spine, sacrum [6,[13][14][15], pelvis [16] and lower extremities [17][18][19]. The quality of imaging is a crucial factor for safe performance of image-based navigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer-assisted navigation surgery has been widely used for patients with trauma [3,8,18] or those having joint arthroplasty [9,11] or spine surgery [14]. Navigation also has been used for patients with malignant bone tumors for precise tumor resection and planned reconstruction presuming it will reduce local recurrence rates and enhance functional outcomes by saving adjacent joint and major neurovascular structures [1,6,7,10,[15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, MRI is essential for computer-assisted navigation surgery in patients with malignant bone tumors, combined with the CT images using the software provided with the navigation system. Three or four corresponding anatomic bone landmarks of the patients then can be established on the fused CT-MR images [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%