2020
DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00161-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Navigation-Assisted Knee Replacement Demonstrates Improved Outcome Compared with Conventional Knee Replacement at Mid-Term Follow-up: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to our patient, arthrofibrosis developed and was treated successfully with MUA. It is unclear whether NPS was the solitary cause for arthrofibrosis, however, because arthrofibrosis may also be correlated with computer navigation itself, as demonstrated in a meta-analysis by Ayekoloye et al 7 . Lachiewicz and Herndon performed a cemented, posterior-stabilized TKA in a patient with NPS 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to our patient, arthrofibrosis developed and was treated successfully with MUA. It is unclear whether NPS was the solitary cause for arthrofibrosis, however, because arthrofibrosis may also be correlated with computer navigation itself, as demonstrated in a meta-analysis by Ayekoloye et al 7 . Lachiewicz and Herndon performed a cemented, posterior-stabilized TKA in a patient with NPS 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors also mentioned that when computer navigation is used in TKR, 85% of the implanted knee replacements had ideal or very good alignment, compared with 55% in traditional TKRs without computer navigation [ 10 ]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis also revealed that computer navigation-assisted knee replacement had improved outcomes when compared with conventional knee replacement, at mid-term follow-up [ 11 ].…”
Section: Literature Review and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the literature still debated the navigated technique’s superiority in clinical and functional outcomes and life quality. Another recent systematic review and meta-analysis [ 25 ], published in 2020, reported a slight improvement in functional outcome using CAS, considering studies with 4 or 5 years of follow-up. The routine role of navigated TKA is still questioned by the costs, the additional operating time, the increased training, the potential for new and increased complications, and the lack of reproducible evidence [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%