1972
DOI: 10.1016/0026-0800(72)90019-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer plotting pole figures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a s processing texture (7) , with the basal planes perpendicular to the longitudinal and transverse directions, Figures I and 2 show that the prism planes are distributed in an almost random intettsity. Although both plates were to have been identical except for interstitial and iron content, the differences in texture are most likely due to variations in p rocessing (6) Regardless of its source, the observed texture 1 was quite mild for a titanium. Variations in cooling rate did not greatly alter the texture; however, it did affect the ordering characteristics of the a`m atrix.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a s processing texture (7) , with the basal planes perpendicular to the longitudinal and transverse directions, Figures I and 2 show that the prism planes are distributed in an almost random intettsity. Although both plates were to have been identical except for interstitial and iron content, the differences in texture are most likely due to variations in p rocessing (6) Regardless of its source, the observed texture 1 was quite mild for a titanium. Variations in cooling rate did not greatly alter the texture; however, it did affect the ordering characteristics of the a`m atrix.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%