2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf01237484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer search for small complete caps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smallest known size of a complete cap in PG (3,8) is 20 [66]. We obtained three inequivalent complete 20-caps in PG (3,8) with the stabilizer groups D 5 , Z 2 , S 3 of orders 10, 2, 6.…”
Section: Some Complete Caps In Pg(3 Q) With Boundary Sizesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The smallest known size of a complete cap in PG (3,8) is 20 [66]. We obtained three inequivalent complete 20-caps in PG (3,8) with the stabilizer groups D 5 , Z 2 , S 3 of orders 10, 2, 6.…”
Section: Some Complete Caps In Pg(3 Q) With Boundary Sizesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Table 3 gives the known sizes of complete caps in PG (3, q). We used the sizes of complete caps and bounds from the works [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]13], [23, Table 1], [25,26,30,31,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]54,56,57,[66][67][68][69]72,73,[75][76][77][78], see also the references therein. We applied the relations (2)- (19) and Theorem 6.…”
Section: The Families Of Complete Caps In Pg(3 Q)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For small q, better values can often be obtained by determining the exact value or by constructively finding a good upper bound (often by computer search); see [18] and [19, Table 1]. In all but one case, k(2, 4, 1) = 5, the exact value of or the best known upper bound on k(2, q, 1) is attained by a complete cap.…”
Section: On 1-saturating Setsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Their size k equals 2 N/2 + 2 (N+2)/2 − 3 and almost attains the upper bound in (1.1). For q > 2, q even, apart from small values of both N and q (see [1,6,7,16,19]), the best upper bound on t 2 (N, q), N > 3, is due to Pambianco and Storme [21], who proved that For N = 3, t 2 (3, q) ≤ 3q + 2 was first proved in [23], whereas in [22], it is shown that t 2 (3, q) ≤ 2q + t 2 (2, q) (see also [16, Table 4.8]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%