2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00155-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer self efficacy and gender: a cross cultural study of Scotland and Romania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
38
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be due to the recognition that men tend to have better technological self-efficacy, and therefore HTSE does not affect their perceptions of PHR use. Although several studies have observed that women revealed lower self-efficacy regarding technological usage than men [52,53]. The lower self-confidence of women toward the usage of technologies may have consequences for their own aptitude beliefs in the use of PHR for health-care activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to the recognition that men tend to have better technological self-efficacy, and therefore HTSE does not affect their perceptions of PHR use. Although several studies have observed that women revealed lower self-efficacy regarding technological usage than men [52,53]. The lower self-confidence of women toward the usage of technologies may have consequences for their own aptitude beliefs in the use of PHR for health-care activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scales to measure this concept have arisen in last decades such as the Computer Self Efficacy (CSE) scale 54 which was subsequently redesigned. [55][56][57] In the present study, we updated the 17-item CSE scale, eliminating some of the items that are no longer relevant in view of the technology advances in the in recent years. The result was a construct measured using 12 items.…”
Section: Aptitude For the Use Of Computersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 29-item positively worded Computer Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) (Durndell, Haag & Laithwaite, 2000) on a 5-point Likert type scale anchored by 1: strongly disagree and 5: strongly agree developed originally by Murphy, Coover, and Owen (1989) and refined by Torkzadeh and Koufteros (1994) and Durndell & Haag (2002) with a slight modification in the present study was administered to participants in the first semester. The modification was related to the rewording of one of the statements of the scale for clarity and to be in accordance to the current computer terminology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some saw the need for refinement (Torkzadeh, 2003;Torkzadeh & Koufteros, 1994) and slight modification to allow for changes in computerrelated practice and technology (Durndell, Haag & Laithwaite, 2000), others (Simsek 2011) indicated no changes were needed. These scales were developed in the most technologically developed countries (e.g., UK, USA, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%