2011
DOI: 10.1134/s0018151x11050038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer simulation of aluminum in the high-pressure range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results are also basically consistent with the MD results of us=5.53292+1.21337up obtained by the multiscale shock technique (MSST) for the aluminum single crystal [7]. The pressure during shock compression for the NC aluminum deviates from the existing experimental values [21,22] and MD results [23] for aluminum single crystal, as shown in Fig. 4.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…The present results are also basically consistent with the MD results of us=5.53292+1.21337up obtained by the multiscale shock technique (MSST) for the aluminum single crystal [7]. The pressure during shock compression for the NC aluminum deviates from the existing experimental values [21,22] and MD results [23] for aluminum single crystal, as shown in Fig. 4.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…(a) The pressure during impact compression of Al. The squares correspond to our MD simulation results; The circles, triangles and diamonds correspond to the MD simulation results of Ju et al,[58] Belashchenko et al,[61] Belashchenko et al,[61] respectively. The stars and crosses correspond to the experimental results of Altshuler et al[62] and Trunin et al,[58] respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Considering the uncertainty of the experiment, and the impact velocity of our subsequent nanoparticle collision simulation is less than 3000 m/s, we believe that the 2NN-MEAM potential of Al and Ni still has good accuracy under strong impact loads, so the 2NN-MEAM potential is used for subsequent collision simulation. [58] Belashchenko et al, [61] Belashchenko et al, [61] respectively. The stars and crosses correspond to the experimental results of Altshuler et al [62] and Trunin et al, [58] respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likal 'ter 1985, 2000, 2002 [14-16] 9300 8000-8860 8860 570 468-447 312 Basin 2002 [17] 5445 192 Singh et al 2006 [18] 8472 509.4 Bhatt et al 2006 [19] 6300 88. 4 Ray et al 2006 [20] 5700 187 Lomonosov 2007 [21] 6250 197 Gordeev et al 2008 [22] 7917 467 Morel et al 2009 [23] 6700800 N/A N/A Faussurier et al 2009 [24] 7963 350 Belashchenk et al 2011 [25] 7050 325 ± 20 675 ± Karabutov et al 2012 [26] 7963 350 -Mishra and Chaturvedi 2012 [27] 8387 445…”
Section: Table 1 a Representative Collection Of Estimated Values Of T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56 Hess 1998 [13] 8944 472. 6 [20] 5700 187 320 Lomonosov 2007 [21] 6250 197 703 Gordeev et al 2008 [22] 7917 467 660 Morel et al 2009 [23] 6700800 N/A N/A Faussurier et al 2009 [24] 7963 350 440 Belashchenk et al 2011 [25] 7050 325 ± 20 675 ± 34 Karabutov et al 2012 [26] 7963 350 -Mishra and Chaturvedi 2012 [27] 8387 445 385…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%