1994
DOI: 10.1021/j100099a033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer simulation of the photoluminescence decay at the GaAs-electrolyte junction. 2. The influence of the excitation intensity under depletion layer conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An underlying assumption in the analysis of the data leading to these very large apparent charge-transfer rate constants is that the real-time photoluminescence decay data is sensitive to, and can be used to evaluate quantitatively, the values of S min and k ct for a semiconductor under the experimental conditions of interest. This assumption appears to be in contradiction to prior experimental work, which has demonstrated that the transient photoluminescence decay signals, , and the transient photocurrent signals, , of a strongly depleted semiconductor/liquid interface under low- or moderate-level injection conditions are insensitive to the value of k ct under most experimentally accessible conditions.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An underlying assumption in the analysis of the data leading to these very large apparent charge-transfer rate constants is that the real-time photoluminescence decay data is sensitive to, and can be used to evaluate quantitatively, the values of S min and k ct for a semiconductor under the experimental conditions of interest. This assumption appears to be in contradiction to prior experimental work, which has demonstrated that the transient photoluminescence decay signals, , and the transient photocurrent signals, , of a strongly depleted semiconductor/liquid interface under low- or moderate-level injection conditions are insensitive to the value of k ct under most experimentally accessible conditions.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Each capture coefficient is related to the product of the thermal velocity, v , of the carrier in the solid and the capture cross section, σ, for each kinetic event such that From the principle of detailed balance, it can be shown that the values of n 1,s , p 1,s , n 1 , and p 1 are definable as , and or, in general, at any point in the solid and where N c is the effective density of states in the conduction band, E f is the Fermi level energy, and E c is the energy of the conduction band. All energies, E c , E v , and E f , are functions of position in the semiconductor. ,,,− …”
Section: Physical Representation Of the Semiconductor/liquid Contact ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surface recombination via midgap states is often assumed to be a facile process which is independent of system parameters such as excitation power and applied potential. Under these circumstances, the surface is a sink for minority carriers, and band unbending is difficult to achieve because the facile loss mechanism increases the required injection rate even further. Yet this picture is inconsistent with recent studies of the GaAs/electrolyte interface, , which suggest that the detailed kinetics of surface recombination has a significant influence on carrier dynamics near the GaAs/electrolyte surface.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…[18][19][20] Under these circumstances, the surface is a sink for minority carriers, and band unbending is difficult to achieve because the facile loss mechanism increases the required injection rate even further. Yet this picture is inconsistent with recent studies of the GaAs/ electrolyte interface, 16, [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] which suggest that the detailed kinetics of surface recombination has a significant influence on carrier dynamics near the GaAs/electrolyte surface.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 58%