1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-583x(98)00996-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer simulation of the reflection of energetic ions from crystal surfaces at glancing incidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intuitively, there is a reasonable hope that the actual constraint is that the corrugation function integrates to zero over a lattice unit, i.e., for symmetric cells. Another very useful extension would be to link directly this model to the 2D row model developed for grazing incidences [33], where the corrugation amplitude may depend on the effective energy. Concerning the limitations, these should the same as exposed in [5] knowing that the intensities are supposed to be better described than the associated phases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, there is a reasonable hope that the actual constraint is that the corrugation function integrates to zero over a lattice unit, i.e., for symmetric cells. Another very useful extension would be to link directly this model to the 2D row model developed for grazing incidences [33], where the corrugation amplitude may depend on the effective energy. Concerning the limitations, these should the same as exposed in [5] knowing that the intensities are supposed to be better described than the associated phases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was rapidly noticed that the fast motion along x and the slow motion, in the (y,z) plane, appear decoupled. In the slow motion plane, the situation is similar to that of a hyper-thermal helium atom, with energy E ⊥ , interacting with a 1D array of quasi-atoms [15]. The fast projectiles are sensitive to the potential averaged along the axial channel, so that only the surface corrugation across the channel is resolved.…”
Section: Gifadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The angle of the two peaks shown in the right panel with respect to the plane of beam axis and surface normal corresponds to the rainbow angle H rb of the related simulated trajectories in the left panel. Different potentials show different corrugated equipotential planes resulting in different rainbow angles at the same normal energy E z [12]. This allows one to derive the effective scattering potential [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the regime of surface channeling, the scattering potential results from averaged continuum potentials with 'planar' or 'axial' symmetry [7]. In recent work [9] we have demonstrated that detailed information on the effective pair potentials at metal surfaces can be derived from ''rainbow'' structures [10] observed in the angular distributions after scattering of fast atoms along axial strings in the surface plane of mono-crystalline samples [9,11,12]. ''Rainbow-scattering'' results from a maximum in the deflection function [10,13,14] for scattering from the strings of surface atoms described by a continuum potential with cylindrical symmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%