2001
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2001.0867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer simulation of water and concentrated ionic solutions. Potential fluctuations and electron localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several classical and ab initio molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo studies of concentrated aqueous bulk solutions of simple inorganic salts, acids, and bases have been performed recently. [138][139][140][141][142][143] However, only after our first MD simulations of slabs containing concentrated salt solutions 3,69,131,132 has such a computational approach become established also for investigating air/solution interfaces. 88,135,[144][145][146] Two ingredients of the simulations proved to be of crucial importance: (i) the inclusion of polarization interactions, which turned out to be responsible for a substantial part of the ionic surface propensity, and (ii) the employment of finite (typically molar) ion concentrations, which not only reflected the usual experimental reality but also allowed for statistically relevant direct sampling of the distribution of ions across the aqueous slab.…”
Section: Finite Ion Concentrations and Counterion Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several classical and ab initio molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo studies of concentrated aqueous bulk solutions of simple inorganic salts, acids, and bases have been performed recently. [138][139][140][141][142][143] However, only after our first MD simulations of slabs containing concentrated salt solutions 3,69,131,132 has such a computational approach become established also for investigating air/solution interfaces. 88,135,[144][145][146] Two ingredients of the simulations proved to be of crucial importance: (i) the inclusion of polarization interactions, which turned out to be responsible for a substantial part of the ionic surface propensity, and (ii) the employment of finite (typically molar) ion concentrations, which not only reflected the usual experimental reality but also allowed for statistically relevant direct sampling of the distribution of ions across the aqueous slab.…”
Section: Finite Ion Concentrations and Counterion Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have documented in previous work, e aq − 's are likely to interact with multiple cations at higher salt concentrations, forming complexes that contain up to three Na + ions and possibly one or two Cl − ions along with the hydrated electron. 29,37 This is because high-concentration aqueous NaCl solutions have agglomerated Na + /Cl − contact ion pairs, so that pre-existing traps with multiple cations are available as localization sites for an injected electron, as shown in Figure S4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We present here a brief summary. The RMC method [15][16][17] is combined with the Metropolis Monte Carlo (MMC) method [18], in an attempt to minimize the agreement factor χ of an atomic system. The χ obtained from the atom positions in the system, represents a weighted difference between the calculated and the experimental system structural features for the RMC method and a temperature-weighted total energy, the form of which depends on the interatomic potential used, for the MMC method in the different ensembles (N V T ), (µV T ), and (N P T ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%