2017
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2016.1274437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer simulation study of the nematic–vapour interface in the Gay–Berne model

Abstract: We present computer simulations of the vapour-nematic interface of the GayBerne model. We considered situations which correspond to either prolate or oblate molecules. We determine the anchoring of the nematic phase and correlate it with the intermolecular potential parameters. On the other hand, we evaluate the surface tension associated to this interface. We find a corresponding states law for the surface tension dependence on the temperature, valid for both prolate and oblate molecules.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a bulk nematic GB fluid, the orientation at the vapour interface has previously been shown to scale with the ratio of the shape and interaction anisotropy parameters, κ/κ , with a faceon orientation observed for κ/κ < 1, and an side-on orientation otherwise. 36 For the systems studied in this work, in which the bulk phase is isotropic rather than nematic and in which solid interfaces are also considered, Fig. 3 shows that κ/κ is not a good predictor of orientation at either the solid or vapour interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For a bulk nematic GB fluid, the orientation at the vapour interface has previously been shown to scale with the ratio of the shape and interaction anisotropy parameters, κ/κ , with a faceon orientation observed for κ/κ < 1, and an side-on orientation otherwise. 36 For the systems studied in this work, in which the bulk phase is isotropic rather than nematic and in which solid interfaces are also considered, Fig. 3 shows that κ/κ is not a good predictor of orientation at either the solid or vapour interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Additional κ values of 0.50 and 0.70 were examined for certain systems to access points with κ > κ, as interfacial behaviour has previously been predicted to exhibit a transition around κ/κ = 1 in some circumstances. 36 Several systems with κ = 1.2 were also studied to examine the behaviour when side-side interactions are stronger than faceface ones. While side-side interactions that are stronger than the face-face ones are not typical of OSCs-like molecules, they can potentially be accessed through, for example, functionalisation of the aromatic core and may present an interesting means of tuning interfacial orientation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Simulations have been previously reported for GB discotic mesogens focused on tracing changes in phase behavior under confinement [99,130,[136][137][138][139][140] and in droplets [141]. The reader interested in additional parameterizations is referred to previous work [127,129,135,[142][143][144][145][146].…”
Section: Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%