2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer simulations of cellular group selection reveal mechanism for sustaining cooperation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The threshold criteria in Propositions 3.2 and 4.2 for the level of relative between-group selection strength λ needed to exhibit long-time cooperation highlight the key importance of all-cooperator groups in sustaining cooperative outcomes for the whole metapopulation. These criteria also provide some analytical support for the numerical intuition provided by Markvoort et al [14] for the necessity of initial all-cooperator groups to promote evolutionary coexistence of cooperators and defectors. The success of all-cooperator groups also plays an important role in Traulsen-Nowak stochastic model of multilevel selection [23], in which there is a separation of time scales such that selection of cooperators or defectors within groups acts much faster than selection between groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The threshold criteria in Propositions 3.2 and 4.2 for the level of relative between-group selection strength λ needed to exhibit long-time cooperation highlight the key importance of all-cooperator groups in sustaining cooperative outcomes for the whole metapopulation. These criteria also provide some analytical support for the numerical intuition provided by Markvoort et al [14] for the necessity of initial all-cooperator groups to promote evolutionary coexistence of cooperators and defectors. The success of all-cooperator groups also plays an important role in Traulsen-Nowak stochastic model of multilevel selection [23], in which there is a separation of time scales such that selection of cooperators or defectors within groups acts much faster than selection between groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…As a result, parasitic replicators dominate the system and strongly inhibit the replication of host replicators, often leading to the eventual extinction of all the replicators. A plausible strategy for primitive host replicators to avoid parasite dominance is compartmentalization [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ] or equivalent spatial structures [ 16 , 20 ]. Compartmentalization might have been achieved in the primordial earth by formation of lipid vesicles [ 21 , 22 ], coacervates [ 23 , 24 ], inorganic compartments at hydrothermal sites [ 25 ], honeycomb structure on mineral surface [ 26 ], atmospheric aerosols [ 27 ], hydrogels [ 28 ], or any other abiotic compartments provided from the surrounding environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies of membrane dynamics, including work by two authors of this manuscript [26], it has been argued that a “division into many” scenario may be possible and more helpful to enzymatic molecules than a binary division [63]. However, studies have also demonstrated processes in which compartments or droplets undergo binary division [61, 62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They co-localize elements which could help cooperation and increase reaction rates [37]. Membranes (or other forms of population structure) also help cooperative functions in avoiding the parasitic take-over that occurs rapidly in a well-mixed system [2224, 26, 38, 39]. Experimental groups have been able to create such compartments, including membrane vesicles that can encapsulate relevant prebiotic polymers and divide [40, 41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation