2004
DOI: 10.1002/chin.200406296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer Simulations of Polymers Close to Solid Interfaces: Some Selected Topics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It means that while aPP-SA is able to yield true twoarm diblock PP-PA copolymers in selected sites of the interface by forming the corresponding imide bridges (Figure 3), those remaining sides propylene grafted SA groups in aPP-SF/SA interfacial modifier give rise to three-arm block copolymers at the interface with the largest interfacial volume requirements ( Figure 3). In agreement with both the simulation results [72] and experimental findings from other authors [73,74], it means an increase in the interfacial ply thickness and in turn the subsequent decrease on the overall available interfacial reaction volume. It implies some kind of saturation in the reaction capabilities of aPP-SF/SA and in consequence its ability to reduce the mean particle size of the heterogeneous blend.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It means that while aPP-SA is able to yield true twoarm diblock PP-PA copolymers in selected sites of the interface by forming the corresponding imide bridges (Figure 3), those remaining sides propylene grafted SA groups in aPP-SF/SA interfacial modifier give rise to three-arm block copolymers at the interface with the largest interfacial volume requirements ( Figure 3). In agreement with both the simulation results [72] and experimental findings from other authors [73,74], it means an increase in the interfacial ply thickness and in turn the subsequent decrease on the overall available interfacial reaction volume. It implies some kind of saturation in the reaction capabilities of aPP-SF/SA and in consequence its ability to reduce the mean particle size of the heterogeneous blend.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, many computer simulations on the polymer/vacuum and the polymer/solid interfaces have been performed over the last thirty years. In the early days, mostly coarse-grained models, such as the simple lattice model [29][30][31], freely-jointed hard sphere model [32][33][34], and Lennard-Jonnes (LJ) bead-spring chain model [35][36][37][38][39], were employed, followed by application of united-atom models [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. The earlier studies showed the general features of polymer thin films and interfaces, but they had critical limitations in that they were unable to include accurate information about the detailed chemical structures of various polymers and their interactions at various surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the molecular dynamics of polymers, each monomer unit is modelled as a lumped mass, like a bead, and their interaction is described by a potential function. The Lennard-Jones type of potential has been frequently used for polymers 1,5,6,8 . The Lennard-Jones potential features a short-range repulsive potential, together with a long-range attractive potential.…”
Section: Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, mechanical properties of polymers have been studied intensively. Recently, molecular dynamics has been applied to characterize the behaviour of polymers or their composites [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] . While ab initio molecular dynamics is more accurate, it is limited to a very small number of atoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation