1976
DOI: 10.1016/0029-554x(76)90806-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer studies of the reflection of light ions from solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 658 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the ion energy is further reduced, core electrons cannot be excited efficiently and details of the density of states in the valence and conduction band of the solid become important. Even if in this regime the projectiles interact only with the delocalized electrons, correlation between elastic and inelastic processes was suggested by Oen and Robinson in an empirical model [12]. In contrast, comprehensive comparison of experimental energy spectra to Monte Carlo simulations revealed that the origin of the surface peak (single scattering peak), which is the most pronounced feature in charge integrated spectra in low energy ion scattering (LEIS), can only be explained by applying a nonlocal energy loss model [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When the ion energy is further reduced, core electrons cannot be excited efficiently and details of the density of states in the valence and conduction band of the solid become important. Even if in this regime the projectiles interact only with the delocalized electrons, correlation between elastic and inelastic processes was suggested by Oen and Robinson in an empirical model [12]. In contrast, comprehensive comparison of experimental energy spectra to Monte Carlo simulations revealed that the origin of the surface peak (single scattering peak), which is the most pronounced feature in charge integrated spectra in low energy ion scattering (LEIS), can only be explained by applying a nonlocal energy loss model [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Also at about this time, a work began in Oak Ridge that originally aimed at testing an analytical theory of particle ranges developed by Holmes and Leibfried [20]. In original works [6,21,22], a structureless target was used, but a model based on a crystalline target was soon developed [23,24], and this made possible the prediction of ion channeling. In both codes, Gaussian quadrature methods were used to evaluate the classical scattering integrals using realistic (though still simplified) interaction potentials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 and Table II). For the target atoms, this is done by using an equipartition of Oen-Robinson (local) [157] and Lindhard-Scharff (nonlocal) [158,159] models. A cutoff energy of 0.5 eV is chosen for the projectiles.…”
Section: Appendix: Simulating Muon Implantationmentioning
confidence: 99%