Computer-supported feedback message tailoring: theory-informed adaptation of clinical audit and feedback for learning and behavior change

Abstract

BackgroundEvidence shows that clinical audit and feedback can significantly improve compliance with desired practice, but it is unclear when and how it is effective. Audit and feedback is likely to be more effective when feedback messages can influence barriers to behavior change, but barriers to change differ across individual health-care providers, stemming from differences in providers’ individual characteristics.DiscussionThe purpose of this article is to invite debate and direct research attention towards a novel audit and feedback component that could enable interventions to adapt to barriers to behavior change for individual health-care providers: computer-supported tailoring of feedback messages. We argue that, by leveraging available clinical data, theory-informed knowledge about behavior change, and the knowledge of clinical supervisors or peers who deliver feedback messages, a software application that supports feedback message tailoring could improve feedback message relevance for barriers to behavior change, thereby increasing the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions. We describe a prototype system that supports the provision of tailored feedback messages by generating a menu of graphical and textual messages with associated descriptions of targeted barriers to behavior change. Supervisors could use the menu to select messages based on their awareness of each feedback recipient’s specific barriers to behavior change. We anticipate that such a system, if designed appropriately, could guide supervisors towards giving more effective feedback for health-care providers.SummaryA foundation of evidence and knowledge in related health research domains supports the development of feedback message tailoring systems for clinical audit and feedback. Creating and evaluating computer-supported feedback tailoring tools is a promising approach to improving the effectiveness of clinical audit and feedback.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0203-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Capabilities and Characteristics of Digital Measurement Feedback Systems: Results from a Comprehensive Review

“…However, Feedback Intervention Theory (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996) posits that standard-feedback gaps create motivation if there is a discrepancy between the observed state and a goal state (i.e., the standard). Peers represent an influential reference group and, in this case, peer data could provide an important standard for comparison (Landis-Lewis, Brehaut, Hochheiser, Douglas, & Jacobson, 2015). Unfortunately, it is unclear how to reconcile these literatures to guide feedback capability prioritization, revealing a critical gap in the study of MFS core capabilities and associated mechanisms.…”

Barriers to using eHealth data for clinical performance feedback in Malawi: A case study

“…Toward this end we are developing tools for tailoring performance feedback that may be used to mitigate the challenges presented by a CAS. [47]…”

Next-generation audit and feedback for inpatient quality improvement using electronic health record data: a cluster randomised controlled trial

“…This is achieved by continuous data generation and processing that summarises large amounts of data in easily presentable formats. The rapid adoption of electronic health records (EHRs)8 now makes such personalised, real-time feedback feasible for clinicians9; however, it is not clear how to integrate such data feedback into a busy clinician’s daily practice in a fashion that promotes behaviour change without impeding clinician workflow or resulting in unintended consequences.…”