1971
DOI: 10.1021/ac60305a015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer techniques for identifying low resolution mass spectra

Abstract: A number of computer programs have been developed for identifying low resolution mass spectra through search of an extensive library file. One set of programs used as a disagreement criterion the sum of the absolute values of the differences in peak height levels when peak height was encoded to 2, 8, or 101 234 levels at each nominal mass. Another program employed the maximum coincidence of the top N peaks. The programs weré tested using 125 unknowns and the recognition performances were compared. The maximum … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With special interest for the broad and unstructured UV/VIS spectra it is necessary to find out which criteria are best fitted to this kind of spectra. Mostly, the absolute deviation or Hamming distance [4,5], the Euclidian distance [6,11] and the correlation coefficient or even correlation functions [7,8] are used for an identification. Ebel and co-workers [9,10] compared the suitability of correlation functions and matrix rank analysis.…”
Section: Distance Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With special interest for the broad and unstructured UV/VIS spectra it is necessary to find out which criteria are best fitted to this kind of spectra. Mostly, the absolute deviation or Hamming distance [4,5], the Euclidian distance [6,11] and the correlation coefficient or even correlation functions [7,8] are used for an identification. Ebel and co-workers [9,10] compared the suitability of correlation functions and matrix rank analysis.…”
Section: Distance Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of a retrieval system with regard to the relative behaviour of the comparison index, should be evaluated on the basis of the ranking of correct and incorrect matches for individual searches, executed with the spectra of the test set. As a measure of this behaviour, the recall as a function of the "confusion" [24] has been used. The confusion is defined here as the number of false positives with a Sr equal or better than the Sr of the target reference spectrum.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the C13rr Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AND function was used initially (18) since this measures similarity and is the most obvious choice. The exclusive OR function (XOR) measures dissimilarity, and more importantly XOR is the binary analog of least squares, which lends a certain theoretical justification to its use (13,19).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Several Boolean Based Comparison Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%