1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02525522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerised prostate boundary estimation of ultrasound images using radial bas-relief method

Abstract: A new method is presented for automatic prostate boundary detection in ultrasound images taken transurethrally or transrectally. This is one of the stages in the implementation of a robotic procedure for prostate surgery performed by a robot known as the robot for urology (UROBOT). Unlike most edge detection methods, which detect object edges by means of either a spatial filter (such as Sobel, Laplacian or something of that nature) or a texture descriptor (local signal-to-noise ratio, joint probability density… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to have an overall qualitative estimate of the functioning of our method we observe that the mean segmentation time of 0.72 ± 0.05 seconds for an image is comparable to [2](less than a second), [15](2.1 second), [11](5 seconds), [3](5 seconds) and inferior only to [20] that achieves segmentation time of 0.3sec in C++ and ITK framework. To have an estimate of overlap accuracy DSC value of 0.95 ± 0.01 is comparable to different measure of overlap accuracy value obtained by [12](Area difference 8.48%), [8](Area difference 4.79 ± 0.68%), [10](Average similarity 89%), [18](Area overlap error 3.98±0.97%), [3](Area overlap 93 ± 0.9%), [16](Area overlap 93%), [21](Area overlap 91%) and [4](Area accuracy 94.05%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, to have an overall qualitative estimate of the functioning of our method we observe that the mean segmentation time of 0.72 ± 0.05 seconds for an image is comparable to [2](less than a second), [15](2.1 second), [11](5 seconds), [3](5 seconds) and inferior only to [20] that achieves segmentation time of 0.3sec in C++ and ITK framework. To have an estimate of overlap accuracy DSC value of 0.95 ± 0.01 is comparable to different measure of overlap accuracy value obtained by [12](Area difference 8.48%), [8](Area difference 4.79 ± 0.68%), [10](Average similarity 89%), [18](Area overlap error 3.98±0.97%), [3](Area overlap 93 ± 0.9%), [16](Area overlap 93%), [21](Area overlap 91%) and [4](Area accuracy 94.05%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These statistics are computed from the histogram of the gray levels of the image and depend only on the individual pixels and not on their neighborhood. In the prostate, first-order statistics have been used in the following models: the intensity profile model [47], gradient models [48,49], models using the gray level threshold of the regions extracted from a neural network [50], a radial basis relief model [51], an instantaneous variation coefficient (ICOV) model [52], a model using the local standard deviation in a multiresolution framework [53], posterior probability models [9,54], mixture probability distribution models [42,43,55,56], or models that are combined in many other ways [13,15,57,58]. Feng et al [49] proposed a weighted combination of gradient and probability distribution functions.…”
Section: Appearancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, outlining the object boundary (e.g. prostate) of ultrasound images is done by employing a set of segmentation processes consisting of image pre-processing, edge enhancing using Radial Bas-Relief [2] followed by a model-based boundary extraction [3]. To form a 3D structure, the contours that use polygonal approximation [4] from adjacent cross sections are connected.…”
Section: Isosurface Reconstruction (Contour Connection)mentioning
confidence: 99%