1996
DOI: 10.3109/01421599609034180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized case-based testing: A modern method to assess clinical decision making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further study is required in this area. Secondly, experts have been found to do better than novices and a number of authors have reported that examinations using KFQs are able to discriminate based on level of training . Thirdly, studies of divergent validity have shown there to be only moderate correlations between examinations using KFQS, MCQs and clinical encounter cards .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further study is required in this area. Secondly, experts have been found to do better than novices and a number of authors have reported that examinations using KFQs are able to discriminate based on level of training . Thirdly, studies of divergent validity have shown there to be only moderate correlations between examinations using KFQS, MCQs and clinical encounter cards .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…True/false and ranking items have also been used. Both paper‐and‐pencil and computerised versions have been used …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the clerkship's ® nal week students take a computerized test (Schuwirth et al, 1996). Students can log onto one of the available computers whenever they want to take the test.…”
Section: A Surgical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively easy and cheap approach which assesses decision-making ability might prove to be a more valuable contribution to this. Computerised case-based testing (CCT) may be such a procedure (Schuwirth et al, 1996(Schuwirth et al, , 1999. It is based on the so-called key-feature concept in which the candidate is presented with large numbers of short, authentically described cases (Bordage, 1987;Page et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%