2022
DOI: 10.3390/tomography8020054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized Decision Support for Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment in CT Urography: Effect on Diagnostic Accuracy in Multi-Institution Multi-Specialty Study

Abstract: This observer study investigates the effect of computerized artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision support system (CDSS-T) on physicians’ diagnostic accuracy in assessing bladder cancer treatment response. The performance of 17 observers was evaluated when assessing bladder cancer treatment response without and with CDSS-T using pre- and post-chemotherapy CTU scans in 123 patients having 157 pre- and post-treatment cancer pairs. The impact of cancer case difficulty, observers’ clinical experience, institu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been shown to be the case for ML tools developed to detect prostate cancer from MRI scans, which did not persuade physicians to change their diagnostic decision in the rare instance that an incorrect probability was assigned by the algorithm. But, overall the AI tool improved physicians' diagnostic accuracy and reduced physicians' variability (Sun et al, 2022).…”
Section: Artificial Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been shown to be the case for ML tools developed to detect prostate cancer from MRI scans, which did not persuade physicians to change their diagnostic decision in the rare instance that an incorrect probability was assigned by the algorithm. But, overall the AI tool improved physicians' diagnostic accuracy and reduced physicians' variability (Sun et al, 2022).…”
Section: Artificial Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has substantial side effects including neutropenia, granulocytopenia, sepsis, mucositis, nausea, and vomiting [ 125 ]. It is therefore of pivotal importance to select patients who will respond to these treatments to avoid the toxicity in potentially unresponsive patients and to provide alternative therapies to unresponsive patients [ 126 ]; moreover, if a patient can be reliably identified as having a complete response to treatment, the option of organ preservation therapy instead of cystectomy may be considered [ 127 ].…”
Section: Artificial Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implemented and validated a DL-CNN structure in TensorFlow 7 to assess the cancer treatment response (T0 versus >T0) 8 . The DL-CNN used in this study consisted of two convolutional layers (C1 and C2), two locally connected layers (L3 and L4), and a fully connected layer (FC10).…”
Section: Dl-cnn Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification process is shown in Figure 4. Radiomics model: For the radiomics model, we extracted 91 features from the segmented pre-and post-treatment lesions, including shape, size, and texture features 8 . The random forest classifier was employed to classify CRs and NCRs, guided by the validation set to select the parameter settings.…”
Section: Dl-cnn Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%