2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01155.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized Image Analysis in Differentiation of Skin Lesions Caused by Electrocution, Flame Burns, and Abrasion

Abstract: In the practice of forensic science, sometimes, it is not easy to understand whether skin lesion is due to electrocution and to differentiate the thermal burns and abrasion-type lesions, especially when electricity source cannot be revealed by death science investigation. Based on the causes of the lesions, cases were classified into three groups. Group 1 included 30 deaths from electrocution. Group 2 included 30 deaths with flame burns. Group 3 included 30 deaths from traffic accident cases, which had abrasio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work has mostly focused on image analysis of histologic sections rather than gross forensic images. Studies have been conducted utilizing morphometric measurements of histologic sections of skin to distinguish electrical burns, thermal burns and abrasions (6, 7) and of lung sections in an attempt to determine deaths from asphyxia (8). In another study, a combination of macroscopic and microscopic quantitative methods was successful in determining the distance range of gunshot wounds (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work has mostly focused on image analysis of histologic sections rather than gross forensic images. Studies have been conducted utilizing morphometric measurements of histologic sections of skin to distinguish electrical burns, thermal burns and abrasions (6, 7) and of lung sections in an attempt to determine deaths from asphyxia (8). In another study, a combination of macroscopic and microscopic quantitative methods was successful in determining the distance range of gunshot wounds (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%