2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86436-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized image understanding system for reliable estimation of spinal curvature in idiopathic scoliosis

Abstract: Analysis of scoliosis requires thorough radiographic evaluation by spinal curvature estimation to completely assess the spinal deformity. Spinal curvature estimation gives orthopaedic surgeons an idea of severity of spinal deformity for therapeutic purposes. Manual intervention has always been an issue to ensure accuracy and repeatability. Computer assisted systems are semi-automatic and is still influenced by surgeon’s expertise. Spinal curvature estimation completely relies on accurate identification of requ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, at concentrations above and equal to 24 %, wastewater SWFE and JB induced morphological changes such as craniofacial abnormalities, pericardial and yolk sac oedema, notochord and somite defects as well as scoliosis. In short, scoliosis refers to the by sideways curvature of the spine/tail (Thalengala et al,2021). These findings are concordant with previously published work where zebrafish exposed to wastewater effluent samples collected from WWTPs in Brazil and hospitals, resulted in malformation of the head, yolk sac, tail, pericardial oedema, spinal cord curvature and pigmentation changes (Ribeiro et al,2020;Wittlerova et al,2020b).…”
Section: Malformations Induced By Swfe and Jbsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In contrast, at concentrations above and equal to 24 %, wastewater SWFE and JB induced morphological changes such as craniofacial abnormalities, pericardial and yolk sac oedema, notochord and somite defects as well as scoliosis. In short, scoliosis refers to the by sideways curvature of the spine/tail (Thalengala et al,2021). These findings are concordant with previously published work where zebrafish exposed to wastewater effluent samples collected from WWTPs in Brazil and hospitals, resulted in malformation of the head, yolk sac, tail, pericardial oedema, spinal cord curvature and pigmentation changes (Ribeiro et al,2020;Wittlerova et al,2020b).…”
Section: Malformations Induced By Swfe and Jbsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, if the applicable treatment for a scoliotic curve is instrumented arthrodesis, longer than necessary fusion means sacrificing too many segments of motion and therefore function [34][35][36][37], increased risk of neurological complications and infection, and increased cost. There is consensus that the incorrect selection of the boundary vertebrae is a significant source of intrinsic error in measuring the Cobb angle on AIS X-rays [22,23,27]. However, in studies of Cobb angle inaccuracy where the error is measured using preselected boundary vertebrae, the erratum is not significantly improved, with intra-observer MBE error in such studies ranging from 3° to 9.04° [25,26,28,29,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this surgical procedure, selecting the appropriate vertebral boundaries determines the curve length to be fused, affecting the biomechanical stability achieved and reducing the incidence of post-surgical complications [18,19]. Conversely, there is a consensus in the literature that selecting the boundary vertebrae in the Cobb angle measurement method in AIS X-ray is a significant source of intrinsic error [20][21][22][23] or the primary source of intrinsic error [24][25][26][27]. The literature on the accuracy and precision of the Cobb method in AIS X-ray indicates that potential sources of intrinsic error in traditional manual measurement include erroneous choice of vertebral endplates, inaccurate drawing of lines along the vertebral endplates, imprecise drawing of perpendicular lines, and inaccurate angle measurement itself [22,[25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the images used in the study were two-dimensional, and the image dimensionality enhanced to improve the model's accuracy is an area that could be improved in the future. Ananthakrishna et al [75] proposed an accurate computer-based automated measurement method that estimates spinal curvature based on identified anatomical landmarks and categorizes the scoliosis into four grades, which helps to minimize subjective errors and shows good accuracy during testing.…”
Section: Scoliosis Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%