1980
DOI: 10.1016/0010-468x(80)90083-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized method for scoring of polygraphic sleep recordings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the method provides a means to find new sleep classification schemes that may be more natural and objective. Gath and Bar-On [18] presented an example of fuzzy-clustering spectral features of a single channel EEG. Other than a qualitative description, there was no attempt to quantify performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the method provides a means to find new sleep classification schemes that may be more natural and objective. Gath and Bar-On [18] presented an example of fuzzy-clustering spectral features of a single channel EEG. Other than a qualitative description, there was no attempt to quantify performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schaltenbrand et al [3] presented a neural network model of automatic staging with results ranging from 84.5% for normal group to 81.0% for insomniac group using 30-s epochs. Gath and Bar-On [18] presented the feasibility of a method based on fuzzy clustering of variable length segments. A similar clustering type study was presented using cat EEG in [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a more detailed description of the methods of data analysis the reader is referred to Gath & Bar-On (1980), Gath et al (1981, 1983.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have recently reported (Gath & Bar-On, 1980) a method for automatic analysis of sleep recordings, this method being implemented on a mini-computer and operated on-line. The advantages of this method are that it is adaptive, requiring very few predetermined parameters, it does not depend on supervised learning of the system, and besides generating the conventional hypnogram, the system can provide the user with signal features not available by the manual analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%