2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0325-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized positive mental imagery training versus cognitive control training versus treatment as usual in inpatient mental health settings: study protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility trial

Abstract: BackgroundEnhancing the capacity to experience positive affect could help improve recovery across a range of areas of mental health. Experimental psychopathology research indicates that a computerized cognitive training paradigm involving generation of positive mental imagery can increase state positive affect, and more recent clinical studies have suggested that this training could be used as an adjunct treatment module to target symptoms related to positive affect deficits, specifically anhedonia. The curren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study was prospectively registered (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02958228) and the protocol was submitted for publication when recruitment was ongoing. 7 There were no substantial changes to methods after trial commencement (…”
Section: Methods Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study was prospectively registered (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02958228) and the protocol was submitted for publication when recruitment was ongoing. 7 There were no substantial changes to methods after trial commencement (…”
Section: Methods Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CCT was an adaptive Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, adapted from that implemented in several studies investigating CCT in the context of depression and rumination. 13,14,19 Participants were presented via headphones with a continuous stream of digits (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9), and asked to calculate the sum of the last two digits heard by clicking a corresponding button on the screen (1-18). The task difficulty was adaptive to participants' performance, in that each session started with an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 3000 ms, and this was reduced by 100 ms following four consecutive correct responses or increased by 100 ms following four consecutive incorrect responses.…”
Section: Cctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied the original 17-item version of the DARS (Rizvi et al, 2015 ) in a German translation by selecting only those items from an extended 26-item version which has been translated to German at the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany, in conjunction with the scale authors (Blackwell et al, 2018 ). The DARS is rated on a five-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), higher values indicating less anhedonia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breaks were self-paced and comprised two screens. The first reminded participants of the task instructions, and the second provided visual feedback on their vividness ratings (as in Blackwell et al, 2018). The visual feedback comprised a graph showing, for each block completed so far that session, their mean, minimum, and maximum vividness ratings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%