1981
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.138.3.7465833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computerized radiologic reporting with voice data-entry.

Abstract: The accurate, voice entry of radiologic reports into a computer takes significantly longer than entry by keyboard. Careful speech and considerable patience are required to avoid an unacceptably high error-rate. With improvements in the future, this technology may compete with the conventional technology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C omputerized voice recognition (VR) for radiology reporting was first described in 1981, 1 and had remained more or less a novelty in the following two decades. Early systems were hampered by limited vocabularies and required 3 to 6 h training sessions before the system recognized the user's voice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C omputerized voice recognition (VR) for radiology reporting was first described in 1981, 1 and had remained more or less a novelty in the following two decades. Early systems were hampered by limited vocabularies and required 3 to 6 h training sessions before the system recognized the user's voice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first attempts at computer-aided processing of radiographic reports in the late 1960 s [2,4], various reporting systems have been developed and used in several hospitals for writing and compiling reports [5,6]. Compared with conventional dictation processing, however, several drawbacks were recognized [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of computerised voice recognition in medicine was first described in radiology in 1981. 3 In early studies the higher error rate of digital transcription when compared with traditional typing was highlighted. The main reasons for the high error rate then were the necessity to speak each word distinctly in a monotonous voice in order for the computer to recognise it.…”
Section: Voice Recognition In Healthcarementioning
confidence: 99%