2019
DOI: 10.1090/tran/7643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing graded Betti tables of toric surfaces

Abstract: We present various facts on the graded Betti table of a projectively embedded toric surface, expressed in terms of the combinatorics of its defining lattice polygon. These facts include explicit formulas for a number of entries, as well as a lower bound on the length of the linear strand that we conjecture to be sharp (and prove to be so in several special cases). We also present an algorithm for determining the graded Betti table of a given toric surface by explicitly computing its Koszul cohomology, and repo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we show in Lemma 2.3 that each minimal polygon ∆ satisfies ls (∆) = lw(∆), where = conv{(0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 1), (0, 1)}. The latter can also be proven using results on lattice width directions of interior lattice polygons (see [4,Lemma 5.3]), but we choose to keep the paper self-contained and have provided a different proof. Moreover, we use the technical Lemma 2.2 in the proofs of both Lemma 2.3 and Theorem 2.4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, we show in Lemma 2.3 that each minimal polygon ∆ satisfies ls (∆) = lw(∆), where = conv{(0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 1), (0, 1)}. The latter can also be proven using results on lattice width directions of interior lattice polygons (see [4,Lemma 5.3]), but we choose to keep the paper self-contained and have provided a different proof. Moreover, we use the technical Lemma 2.2 in the proofs of both Lemma 2.3 and Theorem 2.4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In the joint paper [4] with Castryck and Demeyer, we study the Betti table of the toric surface Tor(∆) ⊂ P (∆∩Z 2 )−1 for lattice polygons ∆. In particular, we present a lower bound for the length of the linear strand of this Betti table in terms of lw(∆), which we conjecture to be sharp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally we produce an array of new conjectures related to Questions 0.1 and 0.3, including conjectures on: Boij-Söderberg coefficients; the number of (disctinct) Schur modules appearing in K p,q (P n , b; d); and a Schur functor interpretation of the conjecture of [CCDL,§8.3].…”
Section: # Of Relevantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a number of entries an explicit formula in terms of the defining lattice polytope was known before. Examples of this can be found in [3,11]. But for this paper the most relevant result is that of Schenck, who proved [16] that for projective toric surfaces coming from a lattice polygon with b lattice boundary points κ p,2 = 0 for all p ≤ b − 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%