2012
DOI: 10.3233/fi-2012-659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing Implications with Negation from a Formal Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2012, Missaoui et.al. [3] have approached the generation of mixed implications from two given sets of implications only with positive and negative attributes respectively. We have followed this line: in [7], we extended the classical FCA framework with new derivation operators constituting a Galois connection for the treatment of negative and positive information in FCA and in [5,6] we proposed some mining algorithms to derive directly mixed implications.…”
Section: Summary Of the Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2012, Missaoui et.al. [3] have approached the generation of mixed implications from two given sets of implications only with positive and negative attributes respectively. We have followed this line: in [7], we extended the classical FCA framework with new derivation operators constituting a Galois connection for the treatment of negative and positive information in FCA and in [5,6] we proposed some mining algorithms to derive directly mixed implications.…”
Section: Summary Of the Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To approach the problem of obtaining a syntactic derivation system, R. Missaoui et al propose to add the following inference rules to Armstrong's axioms: for all a,bMfalseM¯ and AMfalseM¯,…”
Section: Negative Attributes and Mixed Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, they provide a sound and complete syntactic system that allows to reason about m‐implications. Furthermore, in they also provide a method to mining m‐implications from a context based on the search of minimal sets of positive/negative attributes with 0 support (minimal keys). It is obvious that supp( A ) = 0 in a formal context when Pos(A)Neg(A) and consequently, by [Cont], AMfalseM¯ holds.…”
Section: Negative Attributes and Mixed Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And 3WCA thinks over positive and negative information independently. A few works [12,18] have recently been served to rule acquisition or implications by integrating with negative information. Although Wei et al [25] studied rules acquisition of decision formal context based on three-way concept lattices, from which the rules are the forms of "If A, then C" and "If not B, then not D".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%