2021
DOI: 10.1002/nla.2401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing low‐rank approximations of the Fréchet derivative of a matrix function using Krylov subspace methods

Abstract: The Fréchet derivative L f (A, E) of the matrix function f (A) plays an important role in many different applications, including condition number estimation and network analysis. We present several different Krylov subspace methods for computing low-rank approximations of L f (A, E) when the direction term E is of rank one (which can easily be extended to general low rank). We analyze the convergence of the resulting methods both in the Hermitian and non-Hermitian case. In a number of numerical tests, both inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several directions for future research. On the one hand, the generalization of Krylov subspace methods for the first-order Fréchet derivative with low-rank direction term [12,29] to the higher-order case would be interesting to further reduce computational complexity in this setting. On the other hand, it is worth investigating whether the proposed integral representations of the second-order Fréchet derivative also allow to find formulas or at least bounds for level-2 condition numbers of other classes of functions and/or matrices then what we have considered in the present work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several directions for future research. On the one hand, the generalization of Krylov subspace methods for the first-order Fréchet derivative with low-rank direction term [12,29] to the higher-order case would be interesting to further reduce computational complexity in this setting. On the other hand, it is worth investigating whether the proposed integral representations of the second-order Fréchet derivative also allow to find formulas or at least bounds for level-2 condition numbers of other classes of functions and/or matrices then what we have considered in the present work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where I denotes the n × n identity matrix. It is known [9,11,12] that in this case, the first-order Fréchet derivative is given by…”
Section: Analytic Functions Represented By the Cauchy Integral Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This defines an enormous computational task and explains why automatic differentiation and corresponding software tools are almost exclusively applied. Alternative dedicated recent methods like [16] focus on a special problem structure, viz. the action of the differential of the matrix exponential on a rank-one matrix.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Γ is again a path that winds around spec(A) exactly once; see, e.g., [12,18]. In addition to being of theoretical interest, the integral representation also forms the basis of efficient computational methods for approximating L f (A, E), in particular when E is of low rank; see [17,18,21], as well as [29] for an extension to higher-order Fréchet derivatives. Related is the Gâteaux (or directional) derivative of f at A, defined as…”
Section: The Fréchet Derivativementioning
confidence: 99%