1996
DOI: 10.1109/34.485556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing occlusion-free viewpoints

Abstract: This paprr presents inethoi-ls to compuie the locils of nll viewpoints froin which feoturcrs on known polyhedral nhjecls con be viewed in their entirety without being nccluAcd by ailything in ihe eizvironrni?nt. Convcx and coiicavc polyhedra with or withorit holes mid the viewing inndel of perspective projection are eniploycd in this work. h s r d on properties that are dcterrnincd (,f ihe occlusionfree nnd occItiAed loci of viewpoints, two tnethod,r to construct tlie!sc loci together with iheir cninplmity nna… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several researchers (Cowan and Kovesi 1988;Stamos and Allen 1998;Reed and Allen 2000;Tarabanis et al 1996;Maver and Bajcsy 1993;Yi et al 1995;Spletzer and Taylor 2001;Wixson 1994;Abrams et al 1999) have studied and incorporated more complex constraints based on several factors not limited to (1) resolution, (2) focus, (3) field of view, (4) visibility, (5) view angle, and (6) prohibited regions. The set of possible sensor configurations satisfying all such constraints for all the features in the scene is then determined.…”
Section: Scene Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several researchers (Cowan and Kovesi 1988;Stamos and Allen 1998;Reed and Allen 2000;Tarabanis et al 1996;Maver and Bajcsy 1993;Yi et al 1995;Spletzer and Taylor 2001;Wixson 1994;Abrams et al 1999) have studied and incorporated more complex constraints based on several factors not limited to (1) resolution, (2) focus, (3) field of view, (4) visibility, (5) view angle, and (6) prohibited regions. The set of possible sensor configurations satisfying all such constraints for all the features in the scene is then determined.…”
Section: Scene Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several systems take a generate-and-test approach (Sakane et al 1987(Sakane et al , 1992Yi et al 1995), in which sensor configurations are generated and then evaluated with respect to the task constraints. order Another set of methods take a synthesis approach (Anderson 1982;Tarabanis et al 1991Tarabanis et al , 1995bTarabanis et al , 1996Cowan 1988;Cowan and Bergman 1989;Cowan and Kovesi 1988;Stamos and Allen 1998), in which the task constraints are analytically analyzed, and the sensor parameter values that satisfy such analytical relationships are then determined. Sensor simulation is another approach utilized by some systems (Ikeuchi and Robert 1991;Raczkowsky and Mittenbuehler 1989).…”
Section: Scene Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, estimates of the viewpoint location may or may not be available. In case of intensity cameras used in inspection tasks, there is a nearly perfect estimate of the geometry and viewpoint [11][12][13]. In assembly tasks [14] and model-based recognition [15][16][17], the geometry is also known.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tarabanis and Tsai [32] examine the question of complete visibility for general polyhedral environments in three dimensions. For a feature polygon of size m and a polyhedral environment of size n, they present an O(m 3 n 3 ) algorithm for computing the locus of all viewpoints from which the fixed feature polygon can be entirely seen.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%