2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2002.12024
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing Shapley Effects for Sensitivity Analysis

Elmar Plischke,
Giovanni Rabitti,
Emanuele Borgonovo

Abstract: Shapley effects are attracting increasing attention as sensitivity measures. When the value function is the conditional variance, they account for the individual and higher order effects of a model input. They are also well defined under model input dependence. However, one of the issues associated with their use is computational cost. We present a new algorithm that offers major improvements for the computation of Shapley effects, reducing computational burden by several orders of magnitude (from k! • k to 2 … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a given input all interactions and correlations with other ones are mixed up, but the interpretation as parts of the output variance is kept and input rankings are still sensible. For these reasons Shapley effects are now commonly thought as central importance measures in GSA for dealing with dependence, and their estimation has been thoroughly investigated recently (Song et al, 2016;Iooss and Prieur, 2019;Broto et al, 2020;Plischke et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given input all interactions and correlations with other ones are mixed up, but the interpretation as parts of the output variance is kept and input rankings are still sensible. For these reasons Shapley effects are now commonly thought as central importance measures in GSA for dealing with dependence, and their estimation has been thoroughly investigated recently (Song et al, 2016;Iooss and Prieur, 2019;Broto et al, 2020;Plischke et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%