2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.80.065018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the Casimir energy using the point-matching method

Abstract: We use a point-matching approach to numerically compute the Casimir interaction energy for a two perfect-conductor waveguide of arbitrary section. We present the method and describe the procedure used to obtain the numerical results. At first, our technique is tested for geometries with known solutions, such as concentric and eccentric cylinders. Then, we apply the point-matching technique to compute the Casimir interaction energy for new geometries such as concentric corrugated cylinders and cylinders inside … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(47 reference statements)
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement between dots and dotted lines is extremely good. Similar results can be obtained for the Neumann (TE) modes (see 6 for details). It is worth to remark that, when the amplitude of the corrugation is not very small, the exact results cannot be reproduced with a simple fit of the form y(x) = A * cos(x).…”
Section: Cylindrical Rack and Pinionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The agreement between dots and dotted lines is extremely good. Similar results can be obtained for the Neumann (TE) modes (see 6 for details). It is worth to remark that, when the amplitude of the corrugation is not very small, the exact results cannot be reproduced with a simple fit of the form y(x) = A * cos(x).…”
Section: Cylindrical Rack and Pinionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, the matrices P 1 → M 1 and P 2 → M 2 , reobtaining in this way, the usual perfect conductor wave-guide case studied in. 6 For the system of Eq. (11) to have non trivial solutions, the determinant must be zero, i.e.…”
Section: Point-matching Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micromechanical torsion oscillators, which have already been used for Casimir experiments [18], seem readily adaptable for testing Eq. (17). Because the overall strength of the Casimir effect is weaker for a disk than for a sphere, observing Casimir forces in this geometry will require greater sensitivities or shorter separation distances than the sphere-plane case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32]. (Interior geometries were also considered in [33], using large-scale computation, and for the Casimir-Polder interaction in Ref. [34], using the exact tensor Green's function.)…”
Section: Interior Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%