2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the dynamic response of an axially moving continuum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Luo [26] studied the buckling stability and post-buckling chaos of an axially moving plate by Galerkin method and then numerical method. According to the report byČepon and Boltežar [27], the finite difference method is efficient and effective in the dynamical study of forced axially moving continuum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luo [26] studied the buckling stability and post-buckling chaos of an axially moving plate by Galerkin method and then numerical method. According to the report byČepon and Boltežar [27], the finite difference method is efficient and effective in the dynamical study of forced axially moving continuum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where φ(x) = sin(iπx/l) describes the effect of the ith eigenvalue of the stationary beam, and q i (t) represents the generalized transverse displacement (Cepon & Boltezar, 2007). Utilizing boundary condition (3) and substituting Eq.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these researches, the transverse displacement of an axially moving beam was expanded into a Fourier series (a sine series is a good candidate), and the Galerkin method was applied to reduce the partial differential equation (PDE) that governs the transverse motion into a set of ordinary differential equations (ODEs), which is a dimensional discrete model. The discrete models obtained by using the Galerkin method were compared with results obtained by using other methods (e.g., multiple time scales and Laplace transform) as well as experimental results, and good agreements were shown (Pellicano & Vestroni, 2002;Pellicano, Gatellani, & Fregolent, 2004;Cepon & Boltezar, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sze et al [14] employed Galerkin method to discretize the governing equations of an axially moving beam and formulated the incremental harmonic balance method for non-linear vibration. Cepon and Boltezar [15] applied an approximate Gelerkin finite element method to solve the initial-/boundary-value problem of a viscously damped and axially moving beam with pre-tension. It was shown that for certain values of the parameters, especially at high velocities, Galerkin method using stationary string eigenfunctions would give a poor prediction of the dynamic response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%