1998
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-68530-8_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the Edit-Distance Between Unrooted Ordered Trees

Abstract: Abstract. An ordered tree is a tree in which each node's incident edges are cyclically ordered; think of the tree as being embedded in the plane. Let A and B be two ordered trees. The edit distance between A and B is the minimum cost of a sequence of operations (contract an edge, uncontract an edge, modify the label of an edge) needed to transform A into B. We give an O(n 3 log n) algorithm to compute the edit distance between two ordered trees.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
178
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
178
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). In [15], an algorithm for tree editing was presented which was later improved in [13]. This algorithm can be used to determine the minimum number of unpaired base and arc deletions needed in order to obtain a common subsequence of R 1 and R 2 in O(n 2 m lg m) time, and is currently the fastest (worst-case) algorithm for computing the global LCS score of two RNA sequences [4].…”
Section: Lcs Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1). In [15], an algorithm for tree editing was presented which was later improved in [13]. This algorithm can be used to determine the minimum number of unpaired base and arc deletions needed in order to obtain a common subsequence of R 1 and R 2 in O(n 2 m lg m) time, and is currently the fastest (worst-case) algorithm for computing the global LCS score of two RNA sequences [4].…”
Section: Lcs Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second phase, the algorithm computes and stores the longest common subsequence of R 1 [i, i ′ ] and R 2 [j, j ′ ] for every (i, i ′ ) ∈ P 1 and (j, j ′ ) ∈ P 2 . As mentioned in Section 2.2, this can be done by a single execution of the algorithm given in [13].…”
Section: The Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations