2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00180-019-00906-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the halfspace depth with multiple try algorithm and simulated annealing algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In extreme situations, if we select g(x) ∝ h(x), that is, g(x) � c • h(x) (where c � 1/􏽒 A h(x)dx ), the variance of 􏽥 μ will drop to zero, and 􏽥 μ is equal to the exact value 􏽒 A h(x)dx. However, we cannot directly use the IS method defined in (6) during such an extreme situation because we do not know the exact value of 􏽒 A h(x)dx in advance.…”
Section: New Algorithm For Sd In R Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In extreme situations, if we select g(x) ∝ h(x), that is, g(x) � c • h(x) (where c � 1/􏽒 A h(x)dx ), the variance of 􏽥 μ will drop to zero, and 􏽥 μ is equal to the exact value 􏽒 A h(x)dx. However, we cannot directly use the IS method defined in (6) during such an extreme situation because we do not know the exact value of 􏽒 A h(x)dx in advance.…”
Section: New Algorithm For Sd In R Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the definition of SD in (1) is not appropriate in computing the SD value of a data point with respect to a dataset. e MC method in (6) becomes extremely inefficient when dimension p or sample size n is excessively large because the number of simplices containing the original data point decreases with the increase in p or n.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the curse of dimensionality, µ • should behave more and more like a boundary point as m increases. Table 1 shows a performance comparison between SAP and some methods implemented in R packages ddalpha (Pokotylo et al, 2016), depth (Genest et al, 2017), and DepthProc (Kosiorowski and Zawadzki, 2017) and MTMSA (Shao and Zuo, 2020). In calling the first three packages, we used the "approximate" option (since no algorithm can compute the exact depth when m > 6) and increased the number of initial random directions from the default 1000 to 20,000 to boost their accuracy; the other parameters are taken their default values.…”
Section: Location Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the computation of the halfspace depth of a single point in arbitrary dimension is known to be NP-hard [19]. Therefore, a great deal of research has focused on procedures that approximate the true depth [13,6,4,32,2,33]. A particularly simple upper bound on the halfspace and projection depth can be devised if one uses their so-called projection property [13], which means that the overall (multivariate) depth of a point x is expressed as the infimum of (univariate) depths of projections of x with respect to the projected dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%