2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2801539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the melting point and thermodynamic stability of the orthorhombic and monoclinic crystalline polymorphs of the ionic liquid 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride

Abstract: The melting point, enthalpy of fusion, and thermodynamic stability of two crystal polymorphs of the ionic liquid 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride are calculated using a thermodynamic integration-based atomistic simulation method. The computed melting point of the orthorhombic phase ranges from 365 to 369 K, depending on the classical force field used. This compares reasonably well with the experimental values, which range from 337 to 339 K. The computed enthalpy of fusion ranges from 19 to 29 kJ/mol, com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
95
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast with both, LDA/GGA and force field calculations, results obtained with the DRSLL and κ = 1 functionals produce much smaller energy differences between the two experimentally observed polymorphs, i.e., smaller than 0.01 eV per ionic pair. These results are consistent with the observation of both the monoclinic and orthorhombic structures and with the results of Jayaraman and Maginn, 46 and they do not rule out the possibility of a temperature-driven phase transition between them.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast with both, LDA/GGA and force field calculations, results obtained with the DRSLL and κ = 1 functionals produce much smaller energy differences between the two experimentally observed polymorphs, i.e., smaller than 0.01 eV per ionic pair. These results are consistent with the observation of both the monoclinic and orthorhombic structures and with the results of Jayaraman and Maginn, 46 and they do not rule out the possibility of a temperature-driven phase transition between them.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…44 but, due to the small energy difference, the possibility of a phase transition between the two structures upon increasing temperature is re-instated, in agreement with the classical force field results of Jayaraman and Maginn. 46 Electronic energy gaps at the -point of the Brillouin zone are similar for the two structures. LDA, GGA-PBE, and VDW energy gaps are larger in the monoclinic structure, consistently with a higher stability, but the difference is only about 0.2 eV.…”
Section: B Polymorphism Of [Bmim][cl]mentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dependence of μ AB on the choice of particle was found to be within statistical uncertainties, which were computed using the error estimation procedure described in Ref. [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, these models are either Quantitative Structure Property Relationship (QSPR) correlations [6][7][8] , group contribution (GC) type [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] , or molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] The main drawback of the QSPR and GC models is the narrow restrictions in choice of applicable compounds while the main limitation of MD simulations is the high computational demands and the need for starting geometry. 24 In this paper, we present two empirical correlations to predict melting point and viscosity of ILs in a way that does not need experimental input or tedious simulations, but rely on inputs from simple quantum chemical calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%