2007
DOI: 10.1137/05064401x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the Stability Number of a Graph Via Linear and Semidefinite Programming

Abstract: We study certain linear and semidefinite programming lifting approximation schemes for computing the stability number of a graph. Our work is based on, and refines de Klerk and Pasechnik's approach to approximating the stability number via copositive programming (SIAM J. Optim. 12 (2002), 875-892). We provide a closed-form expression for the values computed by the linear programming approximations. We also show that the exact value of the stability number α(G) is attained by the semidefinite approximation of o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peña et al [17] consider the set Q (r) n consisting of the matrices M for which such a decomposition (51) exists involving only the two highest order terms with |β| = r + 2, r. Therefore, Q (r) n is a subcone of the cone K (r) n with equality Q (r)…”
Section: (R)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peña et al [17] consider the set Q (r) n consisting of the matrices M for which such a decomposition (51) exists involving only the two highest order terms with |β| = r + 2, r. Therefore, Q (r) n is a subcone of the cone K (r) n with equality Q (r)…”
Section: (R)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher-order approximation alternatives, with a particular emphasis on SDPbased bounds on the clique number can be found in [48,109,86]. Similar copositive optimization approaches, among many others, were employed to obtain bounds on the (fractional) chromatic number of a graph [56].…”
Section: Combinatorial Problems From a Copositive Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copositive approximation hierarchies [108,86,18,109,67,126,53] start with the zero-order approximation K (0) = P + N whose dual cone is the above discussed P ∩ N , and consist of an increasing sequence K (r) of cones satisfying cl ∪ r≥0 K (r) = C * . For instance, a higher-order approximation due to [108] uses squaring the variables to get rid of sign constraints: S ∈ C * if and only if y ⊤ Sy ≥ 0 for all y such that y i = x 2 i for some x ∈ R n , and this is guaranteed if the n-variable polynomial of degree 2(r + 2) in x,…”
Section: Approximation and Tractable Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refining these approaches, Peña et al [48] derive yet another hierarchy of cones approximating C. Adopting standard multiindex notation, where for a given multiindex β ∈ N n we have |β| := β 1 + · · · + β n and x β := x β1 1 · · · x βn n , they define the following set of polynomials…”
Section: Approximation Hierarchiesmentioning
confidence: 99%