2017
DOI: 10.1109/lcsys.2017.2707409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the Stochastic ${H} ^\infty $ -Norm by a Newton Iteration

Abstract: The stochastic H ∞ -norm is defined as the L 2induced norm of the input-output operator of a stochastic linear system. Like the deterministic H ∞ -norm it is characterised by a version of the bounded real lemma, but without a frequency domain description or a Hamiltonian condition. Therefore, we base its computation on a parametrised algebraic Riccati-type matrix equation and a Newton iteration. For large dimensions, our algorithm outperforms LMI-methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, when it comes to the 𝐻 ∞ problem, previous works assume 𝓁 2 finite-energy exogenous disturbances 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 , regardless of deterministic or stochastic approaches. They all presuppose a disturbance dependent-noise or a state-multiplicative disturbance that vanishes when the system reaches equilibrium 10,16,13,17,18 , or deal with the finite horizon case 19,20 . Compared with other literature on system models, a noticeable feature of the CSVIU method is that infinite-energy 𝓁 2 disturbance signals are accounted for in an infinite horizon approach.…”
Section: 𝑥(𝑘 + 1) = 𝐴𝑥(𝑘) + 𝜎𝜔(𝑘)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, when it comes to the 𝐻 ∞ problem, previous works assume 𝓁 2 finite-energy exogenous disturbances 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 , regardless of deterministic or stochastic approaches. They all presuppose a disturbance dependent-noise or a state-multiplicative disturbance that vanishes when the system reaches equilibrium 10,16,13,17,18 , or deal with the finite horizon case 19,20 . Compared with other literature on system models, a noticeable feature of the CSVIU method is that infinite-energy 𝓁 2 disturbance signals are accounted for in an infinite horizon approach.…”
Section: 𝑥(𝑘 + 1) = 𝐴𝑥(𝑘) + 𝜎𝜔(𝑘)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the difference in ( 14) depends explicitly on 𝑥 𝑘 and 𝜔 𝑘 only, and we denote Δ𝑉 (𝑥 𝑘 , 𝜔 𝑘 ) ∶= 𝑉 (𝑘 + 1, 𝑥 𝑘+1 ) − 𝑉 (𝑘, 𝑥 𝑘 ) for short. By adding and subtracting the terms (16) where…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, when it comes to the H$$ {H}_{\infty } $$ problem, previous works assume 2$$ {\ell}_2 $$ finite‐energy exogenous disturbances, 8‐15 regardless of deterministic or stochastic approaches. They all presuppose a disturbance dependent‐noise or a state‐multiplicative disturbance that vanishes when the system reaches equilibrium, 10,13,16‐18 or deal with the finite horizon case 19,20 . Compared with other literature on system models, a noticeable feature of the CSVIU method is that infinite‐energy 2$$ {\ell}_2 $$ disturbance signals are accounted for in an infinite horizon approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, note that most existing literature on ℋ ∞ control of linear, continuoustime stochastic systems usually considers systems with only multiplicative noise, cf. for example (HINRICHSEN D. PRITCHARD, 1998;UGRINOVSKII, 1998;CHEN, 2006;DRAGAN et al, 2006;SHAKED, 2006;SHAKED, 2008;ZHANG et al, 2014;SHENG et al, 2015;DAMM et al, 2017) . Hinrichsen and Pritchard point out in (HINRICHSEN D. PRITCHARD, 1998) that the use of additive white noise might pose additional, restrictive conditions on the the design of ℋ ∞ controllers.…”
Section: Long Run Average Cost and Robust Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%