2007
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2007.896864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing the Stopping Distance of a Tanner Graph Is NP-Hard

Abstract: Two decision problems related to the computation of stopping sets in Tanner graphs are shown to be NP-complete. It follows as a consequence that there exists no polynomial time algorithm for computing the stopping distance of a Tanner graph unless P=NP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much like rank-deficient sets, it is very challenging to give a full characterization of dead-end sets of an arbitrary group generation matrix A [23]. Therefore, it is also challenging to determine the decoding guarantee of extended grouping based on A.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Much like rank-deficient sets, it is very challenging to give a full characterization of dead-end sets of an arbitrary group generation matrix A [23]. Therefore, it is also challenging to determine the decoding guarantee of extended grouping based on A.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because, to the best of our knowledge, there is no known efficient algorithm for finding rank-deficient or dead-end sets of any size [23], we have difficulty providing theoretical results of error rates for any given parameters. Therefore, we present theoretical error rates only for the small target collection size n = 25 and mainly use simulation to evaluate different schemes.…”
Section: A Study Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; T g, relative to the super-channel determined by . By (11), for rate R = S s=1 C s 04, the error probability averaged over the ensemble of codes PrfŴ() 6 = W g is not larger than 2 for each decoder , for all large enough block lengths T . Here > 0 is the parameter that specifies the typical set A T .…”
Section: S S=1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms to continue the decoding procedure in case a nonempty stopping set is reached are presented in [17], [1]. It has been shown in [11], [14] that determining the sizes of stopping sets is NP-hard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the last property follows from the observation that any set S of size jSj > n 0 k contains the support of a nonzero codeword as the Let s denote the smallest size of a nonempty stopping set (and thus the smallest size of a dead-end set), i.e., s = minfi 1 : S i > 0g = minfi 0 : D i > 0g: (11) The number s is called the stopping distance for the parity-check matrix H H H in [19]. For any parity-check matrix H H H of a binary linear [n; k; d] block code C, it holds that the stopping set enumerator satisfies…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%