2009
DOI: 10.1186/1476-072x-8-23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computing travel time when the exact address is unknown: a comparison of point and polygon ZIP code approximation methods

Abstract: Background: Travel time is an important metric of geographic access to health care. We compared strategies of estimating travel times when only subject ZIP code data were available.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A GIS layer representing road Berke and Shi (2009) and modified based on the author's knowledge of speed limits in the immediate study area. Second, the edges of the network were split into lixels of approximately one-tenth mile (0.16 km) for the purposes of computing the density estimates, and minimum travel time for each lixel was computed based on its length and assigned maximum velocity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A GIS layer representing road Berke and Shi (2009) and modified based on the author's knowledge of speed limits in the immediate study area. Second, the edges of the network were split into lixels of approximately one-tenth mile (0.16 km) for the purposes of computing the density estimates, and minimum travel time for each lixel was computed based on its length and assigned maximum velocity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Onega et al 2008Onega et al , 2010aOnega et al , 2010bOnega et al , 2011Onega, Duell, Shi, Demidenko, Gottlieb, et al 2009;Celaya et al 2010). Berke and Shi (2009) found that when simply using geometric centroids of zip code polygons, which was adopted by many health-care studies, the error of the estimated average travel time can go above 10%; when more detailed population data are incorporated, the average error can go below 3%. With RCMC, rather than using centroids (however defined) or service area belts to measure aggregate travel distance or travel time, one can make individual measurements based on the disaggregated locations, which avoids the imprecision problem and its consequences.…”
Section: Health-care Access Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2011 for an overview). Using metric distances seems obsolete since the new GIS technologies makes possible to calculate, with a relatively high precision, the temporal distances (Berke and Shi 2009;Salonen et al;Shaw 2006) or the economic ones (cf. Combes and Lafourcade 2005).…”
Section: Preliminary Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%