COMT Val158Met and BDNF Val66Met Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms Are Not Associated With Emotional Distress One Year After Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract

Emotional distress is a common, but poorly addressed, feature of moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Previously identified sociodemographic, psychological, and injury-related factors account for only a small proportion of the variability in emotional distress post-TBI. Genetic factors may help to further understand emotional distress in this population. The catechol- O -methyltransferase (COMT) Val158 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) 66Met single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified as possible contributory factors to outcomes after TBI. We investigated whether the COMT Val158 and BDNF 66Met SNPs were associated with emotional distress 1 year after moderate-severe TBI, and whether these associations were moderated by age, sex, and TBI severity (as measured by the duration of post-traumatic amnesia [PTA]). Moderate-severe TBI survivors (COMT, n = 391; BDNF, n = 311) provided saliva samples after admission to a TBI rehabilitation hospital. At a follow-up interview ∼1 year after injury, participants completed a self-report measure of emotional distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS). Multiple linear regression models were constructed for each SNP to predict total scores on the HADS. Neither COMT Val158 nor BDNF 66Met carriage status (carrier vs. non-carrier) significantly predicted emotional distress (COMT, p = 0.49; BDNF, p = 0.66). Interactions of SNP × age (COMT, p = 0.90; BDNF, p = 0.93), SNP × sex (COMT, p = 0.09; BDNF, p = 0.60), SNP × injury severity (COMT, p = 0.53; BDNF, p = 0.87), and SNP × sex × age (COMT, p = 0.08; BDNF, p = 0.76) were also non-significant. Our null findings suggest that COMT Val158 and BDNF 66Met SNPs do not aid the prediction of emotional distress 1 year after moderate-severe TBI, neither in isolation nor in interaction with age, sex and injury severity. The reporting of null findings such as ours is important to avoid publication bias and prompt researchers to consider the challenges of single-gene candidate studies in understanding post-TBI outcomes. Analyses in larger samples that incorporate multiple genetic factors and their relevant moderating factors may provide a greater understanding of the role of genetics in post-TBI emotional distress.