2022
DOI: 10.1007/s42979-022-01182-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concat_CNN: A Model to Detect COVID-19 from Chest X-ray Images with Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of [30] proposed a concatenation-based CNN (Concat_CNN) model to detect COVID-19 from chest X-rays images. A comparison was made between Concat_CNN and the following transfer models: VGG16, InceptionV3, Resnet50, and DenseNet121.…”
Section: The Detection Of Covid-19 Using Chest X-raysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors of [30] proposed a concatenation-based CNN (Concat_CNN) model to detect COVID-19 from chest X-rays images. A comparison was made between Concat_CNN and the following transfer models: VGG16, InceptionV3, Resnet50, and DenseNet121.…”
Section: The Detection Of Covid-19 Using Chest X-raysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [29], the authors indicated that COVID-Net has a recorded accuracy at 92.4 A. In [30], the authors proposed Concat_CNN, which recorded A = 96.31, P = 95.8, and R = 92.99. In [32], a concatenated CNN model was proposed and recorded A = 98.02, F1 = 98.24, P = 97.04, and R = y.…”
Section: Comparison With Literature Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate that it can classify well given the distribution of different datasets, the trained model required to be validated. The proposed model compared to pre-trained models contains ResNet50-v2 [8] and Inception-v3 [19]. Figure 5 shows the performance comparison of the CNN models.…”
Section: B Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%