2004
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38268.579097.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concealment of drugs in food and beverages in nursing homes: cross sectional study

Abstract: Objective To examine the practice of concealing drugs in patients' foodstuff in nursing homes. Design Cross sectional study with data collected by structured interview. Setting All five health regions in Norway. Participants Professional carers of 1362 patients in 160 regular nursing home units and 564 patients in 90 special care units for people with dementia. Main outcome measures Frequency of concealment of drugs; who decided to conceal the drugs; how this practice was documented in the patients' records; a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
35
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Kirkevold and Engedal (2005), in their large survey of Norwegian nursing homes, reported 11% of patients in regular nursing homes and 17% in special units for people with dementia had medicines mixed with food or drink at least once a week and, as in our study, in only 40% of cases was the practice documented. But in a study of non-specialist nursing homes in south-east England, staff reported that only 5% of residents had ever had to be given their medication covertly (Macdonald et al, 2004).…”
Section: Covert Administrationsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Kirkevold and Engedal (2005), in their large survey of Norwegian nursing homes, reported 11% of patients in regular nursing homes and 17% in special units for people with dementia had medicines mixed with food or drink at least once a week and, as in our study, in only 40% of cases was the practice documented. But in a study of non-specialist nursing homes in south-east England, staff reported that only 5% of residents had ever had to be given their medication covertly (Macdonald et al, 2004).…”
Section: Covert Administrationsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…As identified in this study, the use of enteral tubes as a route for medicine administration can interfere with nutritional intake either because of the time taken for the medicines to be administered through the tube or because the medicines block the tube. Also, although only alluded to, medicines are hidden in food to aid their administration and, in addition to the ethical issue of the covert administration of medicines [19,[50][51][52], the taste of the food itself may be affected with a negative effect on nutritional intake.…”
Section: Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, in most cases patients need their medicines and there are no alternative formulations. A frequent response to this is to crush tablets or open capsules and to mix the residue with food or put it down the enteral tube [12][13][14][15][16]. However, in altering the formulation of a medicine there are legal implications because Marketing Authorisation is granted to a pharmaceutical company on the basis that the medicine will be taken by the patient in the form in which it was manufactured and through the tested route.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the legacy of prior regulatory arrangements may help to explain this apparent anomaly, a limited engagement with standardised instruments and the low response rate to this question raise cause for concern. For example, weak or inadequate record keeping has often been associated with covert administration of medicines Stubbs, 2010a &2010b;Kirkevoid and Engedal, 2005;Treloar et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%