To remain globally competitive, education in the United
States
must focus on retaining students in science, technology, engineering,
and mathematics (STEM). As laboratory courses have the potential to
be powerful attractors or deterrents to a field, developing effective
laboratory pedagogies is important to retain students in STEM. A course-based
undergraduate research experience (CURE) is one model for laboratory
instruction that has generated an increasing amount of attention.
This has been driven by their success, especially in increasing students’
self-efficacy and science identity, two long-term indicators of persistence
in STEM. Herein is reported a large introductory organic chemistry
CURE course framework that focuses on green reaction optimization.
Students were given an unoptimized alkene epoxidation procedure, split
into small “research” groups, and tasked with improving
conversion while minimizing reaction inputs. After three rounds of
optimization, groups increased conversion 10–20-fold compared
to baseline conditions. Then, students investigated the substrate
scope of their conditions and analyzed trends in relative reactivities
based on principles learned in lecture and from the literature. Lastly,
students summarized their findings in a final slideshow presentation.
Surveys were used to evaluate different aspects common to CURE courses
and students’ sense of project ownership. The scores obtained
were consistent with other reported CURE courses. Importantly, students
saw large gains in self-efficacy and science identity. Students had
an overwhelmingly positive response to the curriculum based on informal
and written feedback. This approach is generalizable to a wide range
of institutions with different equipment availability, reaction types,
and course coverage schedules.