2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentrated plasticity modelling of RC frames in time-history analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The case study structures are modelled as 3D buildings in the OpenSees software program version 3.6.0 [47,48], adopting the modelling procedure presented in [49] and validated in [1,5,6,41,43]. Beams and columns are implemented through the forceBeamColumn element object [50], assigning a non-linear behavior to the external sections and a linear elastic behavior to the internal section of the element, as shown in Figure 9.…”
Section: Opensees Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case study structures are modelled as 3D buildings in the OpenSees software program version 3.6.0 [47,48], adopting the modelling procedure presented in [49] and validated in [1,5,6,41,43]. Beams and columns are implemented through the forceBeamColumn element object [50], assigning a non-linear behavior to the external sections and a linear elastic behavior to the internal section of the element, as shown in Figure 9.…”
Section: Opensees Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dead and live loads, as provided in the relevant references [9,59], were uniformly applied to the beams according to the warping shown in Figures 8 and 10. Following [62,63], the beams and columns were modeled using the forceBeamColumn element object [64], which is composed of two external sub-elements of length L pl corresponding to the end regions where inelastic behavior can be triggered, and an internal sub-element characterized by a linear elastic behavior. A different L pl length was assumed for either case-study structure, namely, Equation (4) for the RC building and Equation (5) for the steel MRF.…”
Section: Modeling Of the Case-study Frames In Openseesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation ( 4) is equivalent to the provision of the Eurocode 8 [65], where z is the shear span of the structural element, h is the depth of the section, d b is the diameter of the longitudinal rebar, f y is the yield strength of steel, and f c is the compressive strength of concrete. According to the norm [65], Equation ( 4) is valid when a well-detailed confinement model of concrete is assumed [62]. For this reason, for the concrete model, the uniaxial material Concrete04 [55], which is based on the model proposed by Popovics [66], was implemented.…”
Section: Modeling Of the Case-study Frames In Openseesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the several existing methods to simulate cyclic response on reinforced concrete buildings through a non-linear analysis, there are two main categories to represent the non-linear material response on a Finite Element simulation: distributed plasticity, which can be represented by fiber models, and concentrated (or lumped) plasticity models [13]. Fiber models can capture cracking behavior and the spread of plasticity throughout the element, and discretize the element crosssection, considering confined and unconfined concrete and different configurations for longitudinal reinforcement steel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%