2000
DOI: 10.2307/3434721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentrated Swine Feeding Operations and Public Health: A Review of Occupational and Community Health Effects

Abstract: Recent industry change in swine-management practices have resulted in a growing controversy surrounding the environmental and public health effects of modern swine production. The numerous wastes produced by intensive swine production not only pose a significant chalienge to effective environmental management but also are associated with decreased air quality in confinement houses, potentialy transferable antimicrobial resistance patterns, and several infectious agents that can be pathogenic to humans. Publish… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…aureus may spread from animals to humans through direct contact and through contact with animal dander, particles from decomposing waste [2], and aerosols generated by animal activity (e.g. movement, coughing, and/or sneezing) [3]. Clonal complex (CC) 398 is the most widely described strain, although CC9 is increasingly reported in Asia [4,5] and the United States [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aureus may spread from animals to humans through direct contact and through contact with animal dander, particles from decomposing waste [2], and aerosols generated by animal activity (e.g. movement, coughing, and/or sneezing) [3]. Clonal complex (CC) 398 is the most widely described strain, although CC9 is increasingly reported in Asia [4,5] and the United States [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manure management and storage practices can also produce air pollutants such as particulate matter and volatile compounds, as well as a variety of bioaerosols, that may have adverse health effects on animals, farm workers, and individuals in nearby residences (Cole et al, 2008; Mitloehner and Calvo, 2008). Inhalation of bioaerosols and dusts from animal feeding operations has been associated with increased levels of allergy, asthma, and infectious disease (Cole et al, 2000; Von Essen and Auvermann, 2005). Airborne endotoxins, in particular, have received much attention because they are a potent inducer of inflammatory reactions in the respiratory tract when inhaled (Portengen et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the health effects could be caused by another agent in the environment, possibly other chemicals (metals, irritative gases (eg, NH 3 , O 3 and H 2 S) or other inorganic substances) or biological agents (virus, bacteria (eg, Gram-positive bacteria constituent PGN), mould or fungus) that were either not changed or not measured in this study 31 38. In our previous studies, health effects seemed to be linked especially to PGN, while ammonia could be ruled out 16 17 36 37…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%