Concentration Addition, Independent Action, and Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships for Chemical Mixture Toxicities of the Disinfection By products of Haloacetic Acids on the Green Alga Raphidocelis subcapitata

Abstract

The potential toxicity of haloacetic acids (HAAs), common disinfection by products (DBPs), has been widely studied; but their combined effects on freshwater green algae remain poorly understood. The present study was conducted to investigate the toxicological interactions of HAA mixtures in the green alga Raphidocelis subcapitata and predict the DBP mixture toxicities based on concentration addition, independent action, and quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models. The acute toxicities of 6 HAAs (iodoacetic acid [IAA], bromoacetic acid [BAA], chloroacetic acid [CAA], dichloroacetic acid [DCAA], trichloroacetic acid [TCAA], and tribromoacetic acid [TBAA]) and their 68 binary mixtures to the green algae were analyzed in 96‐well microplates. Results reveal that the rank order of the toxicity of individual HAAs is CAA > IAA ≈ BAA > TCAA > DCAA > TBAA. With concentration addition as the reference additive model, the mixture effects are synergetic in 47.1% and antagonistic in 25%, whereas the additive effects are only observed in 27.9% of the experiments. The main components that induce synergism are DCAA, IAA, and BAA; and CAA is the main component that causes antagonism. Prediction by concentration addition and independent action indicates that the 2 models fail to accurately predict 72% mixture toxicity at an effective concentration level of 50%. Modeling the mixtures by QSAR was established by statistically analyzing descriptors for the determination of the relationship between their chemical structures and the negative logarithm of the 50% effective concentration. The additive mixture toxicities are accurately predicted by the QSAR model based on 2 parameters, the octanol–water partition coefficient and the acid dissociation constant (pKa). The toxicities of synergetic mixtures can be interpreted with the total energy (ET) and pKa of the mixtures. Dipole moment and ET are the quantum descriptors that influence the antagonistic mixture toxicity. Therefore, in silico modeling may be a useful tool in predicting disinfection by‐product mixture toxicities. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1431–1442. © 2021 SETAC

Predicting the Time-Dependent Toxicities of Binary Mixtures of Five Antibiotics to Vibrio qinghaiensis sp.-Q67 Based on the QSAR Model

“…The QSAR models had higher R 2 and lower RMSE than the CA and IA models, which indicated that the quality of the QSAR model was stronger compared to the CA and IA models. Several studies have indicated that the predictive ability of the QSAR model in determining the toxicity of mixtures surpasses that of the CA and IA models. − …”

Toxicity interactions of azole fungicide mixtures on Chlorella pyrenoidosa

“…32,33 The MDR is the ratio of the concentration addition or independent action predicted value (EC x,Pred ) and the observed effect concentration (EC x,Obs ) as shown in equation 6. 34 Note: α and β is the position and slope parameters, respectively; R 2 means the maximum determination coefficient; RMSE respects the minimum root mean square error; pEC 50 is the negative logarithm 50% effect concentration; NOEC is the no observed effect concentration.…”