2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10453-012-9285-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration and distribution characteristics of airborne fungi in indoor and outdoor air of Tehran subway stations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the air sampling, the head was cleaned with 70% alcohol [13]. The Petri dishes were closed and delivered to the Central Laboratory of Public Health School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the air sampling, the head was cleaned with 70% alcohol [13]. The Petri dishes were closed and delivered to the Central Laboratory of Public Health School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, bioaerosol emissions during peak hours are much higher than those during off-peak hours [190,192,193,204,208], and concentrations in spring are higher than those in winter, which may correlate to higher outside temperatures and snow melting [196,202]. Meanwhile, the number of passengers and frequencies of trains may increase concentrations and transmissions of subway microbes [191,192,194,202,206,209,210]. Additionally, Heo and Lee suggested that concentrations of bacterial aerosols were affected by the number of passengers, but fungal aerosols were slightly affected by seasonal changes and human activities [211].…”
Section: Bioaerosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collected bacterial samples were incubated at 35 ± 0.5°C temperature for 24-48 h (Heo et al 2014) while fungal samples at 20-28°C for 3-7 days (Hoseini et al 2013), respectively. The bioaerosol concentration was expressed as colony forming units per cubic meter of air (CFU/m 3 ) after the standard positive-hole correction method was taken into account to statistically correct the counting (Ponce-Caballero et al 2013).…”
Section: Microbial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%