1995
DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199528020-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration-Controlled Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the CCD procedure was unsuccessful in differentiating MPA exposure between the 2 arms, a conclusion regarding method effectiveness of CCD cannot be drawn. 56,109,110 This contrasts with the TCI trials, which clearly demonstrated that MPA exposure can be effectively controlled, leading to outcome benefits. 26,34,35…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As the CCD procedure was unsuccessful in differentiating MPA exposure between the 2 arms, a conclusion regarding method effectiveness of CCD cannot be drawn. 56,109,110 This contrasts with the TCI trials, which clearly demonstrated that MPA exposure can be effectively controlled, leading to outcome benefits. 26,34,35…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Concentration-controlled clinical trials have been proposed as a means to reduce pharmacokinetic variability and improve drug response rates (83). The complexity of implementation, the almost inevitable need for TDM-adjusted dosing in eventual clinical use, and the fact that pharmacokinetic variability is often not the major source for response variability have meant these trials have not been adopted into mainstream development (84)(85)(86). Effect or biomarker-controlled clinical trials represent an evolution of these study designs that can better explore sources of response variability, whether pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic (84,87).…”
Section: Trial Designs That Support Investigation Of Respondersmentioning
confidence: 99%