2019
DOI: 10.1002/etc.4342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration dependence of in vitro biotransformation rates of hydrophobic organic sunscreen agents in rainbow trout S9 fractions: Implications for bioaccumulation assessment

Abstract: In vitro biotransformation studies were performed to support the bioaccumulation assessment of 3 hydrophobic organic ultraviolet filters (UVFs), 4‐methylbenzylidene camphor (4‐MBC), 2‐ethylhexyl‐4‐methoxycinnamate (EHMC), and octocrylene. In vitro depletion rate constants (kdep) were determined for each UVF using rainbow trout liver S9 fractions. Incubations performed with and without added cofactors showed complete (4‐MBC) or partial (EHMC and octocrylene) dependence of kdep on addition of the reduced form of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(148 reference statements)
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proper settings for the binding factor f u are currently under discussion as a known source of uncertainty in the IVIVE process, which is mentioned in the guidance document (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2018c). The extrapolation process as a whole has received much recognition, and different improvements are being proposed (Lee et al 2017;Krause and Goss 2018;Trowell et al 2018;Saunders et al 2019). Furthermore, some alternative approaches are in development that, for example, take the substance's sorption to different biological matrices into consideration (Krause and Goss 2018).…”
Section: Research Needs Of the Ivive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proper settings for the binding factor f u are currently under discussion as a known source of uncertainty in the IVIVE process, which is mentioned in the guidance document (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2018c). The extrapolation process as a whole has received much recognition, and different improvements are being proposed (Lee et al 2017;Krause and Goss 2018;Trowell et al 2018;Saunders et al 2019). Furthermore, some alternative approaches are in development that, for example, take the substance's sorption to different biological matrices into consideration (Krause and Goss 2018).…”
Section: Research Needs Of the Ivive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro metabolic stability assays with human or rodent liver preparations became a standard system in human toxicology and pharmacology for the prediction of hepatic clearance of drugs. However, these in vitro systems tend to underpredict in vivo rates of biotransformation (Wood et al 2017), and this may apply for piscine in vitro systems as well (Han et al 2009; Laue et al 2014; Saunders et al 2019). One possible mechanism behind the underprediction could be technical issues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metabolic rate values of in vitro metabolic stability assays are sensitive to the assay conditions. Avoiding underestimation of in vitro intrinsic clearance rates requires careful selection of substrate concentration (low enough not to saturate the metabolic enzymes but high enough to meet analytical sensitivity requirements), of biological material concentration (low enough to minimize nonspecific substrate binding to protein but high enough to ensure adequate substrate depletion), and of incubation time (short enough to ensure the stability of enzyme activities but long enough to be able to adequately measure loss of substrate) (Lo et al 2015; Nichols et al 2018b; Saunders et al 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, the effect of PMSF on liver carboxylases from fish has not been evaluated. We note, however, that several chemical classes of interest with respect to bioaccumulation assessment contain ester bonds, including pyrethroid pesticides (Nishi et al 2006), phthalate esters (Mentlein and Butte 1989), and some UV‐blocking agents (Saunders et al 2019). Interactions of PMSF with CYP enzymes are also possible (Sevrioukova 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%