1988
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.8.11.4799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration dependence of transcriptional transactivation in inducible E1A-containing human cells.

Abstract: The adenovirus ElA proteins are essential for the normal temporal activation of transcription from every other adenoviral early promoter. High-level ElA expression in the absence of viral infection would facilitate biochemical studies of ElA-mediated transactivation. Toward this end, we introduced the adenovirus type 2 ElA gene under the control of the murine mammary tumor virus promoter into HeLa cells. Uninduced cells expressed little or no detectable ElA mRNA. Upon induction, mRNA levels accumulated to abou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
14
2

Year Published

1989
1989
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In a previous report (8), the construction of ElA-expressing HT1080 fibrosarcoma and A2058 melanoma cell lines was described; ElA-expressing HeLa cells (9) (8,9) and, in the present study, protein expression was documented by immunoprecipitation with ElA-specific monoclonal antibodies (Fig. 1).…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In a previous report (8), the construction of ElA-expressing HT1080 fibrosarcoma and A2058 melanoma cell lines was described; ElA-expressing HeLa cells (9) (8,9) and, in the present study, protein expression was documented by immunoprecipitation with ElA-specific monoclonal antibodies (Fig. 1).…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…- (5,26) and thereby stimulate only promoters that contain that sequence, Ela does not function through any one sequence, does not specifically bind to DNA, and therefore is not limited in the promoters that it stimulates (1,8,18). Rather, Ela promiscuously stimulates transcription: it increases expression from a broad variety of promoters in transfection experiments and stimulates a smaller but still substantial number of viral and cellular promoters during the natural course of infection (1,6,11,16,31,33,39,40,42).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of induction was greater in Ad5 infections, presumably because of the difference in efficiency between the two techniques. The cotransfection technique was preferred because it avoids the complicating effects of viral infection on host cell RNA metabolism (5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%