1996
DOI: 10.1021/ie950124y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration-Dependent Kinetic Model for Catalyst Deactivation in the MTG Process

Abstract: From experimental results obtained in a wide range of operating conditions (temperature and contact time) in an isothermal fixed-bed integral reactor, the usefulness of the model of Schipper and Krambeck (Chem. Eng. Sci. 1986, 41, 1013−1019) for simulating the operation has been proven in the 300−375 °C range. The validity of a deactivation kinetic model dependent on the composition of the three lumps for the MTG process (oxygenates, light olefins, and the rest of the products) has been proven, for a wide inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
69
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equations dependent on the concentration of reaction components have been proposed in the literature by considering that oxygenates are the main coke precursors, although this formation is also favored by the concentration of C 2 AC 4 olefins and C 5þ lump. 15,43,44 Coke formation from oxygenates is explained through the ''hydrocarbon pool'' mechanism, 26,27,45,46 and coke formation mechanism on HZSM-5 zeolites from olefins and aromatics, which are well-established in the literature. 35,47 The results of coke content deposited on the catalyst for different values of space time at 450 and 500 C (Table 3) reveal that coke deposition is favored by higher-concentrations of oxygenates in the reaction medium (corresponding to a lower-space time).…”
Section: Consideration Of Deactivation In the Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Equations dependent on the concentration of reaction components have been proposed in the literature by considering that oxygenates are the main coke precursors, although this formation is also favored by the concentration of C 2 AC 4 olefins and C 5þ lump. 15,43,44 Coke formation from oxygenates is explained through the ''hydrocarbon pool'' mechanism, 26,27,45,46 and coke formation mechanism on HZSM-5 zeolites from olefins and aromatics, which are well-established in the literature. 35,47 The results of coke content deposited on the catalyst for different values of space time at 450 and 500 C (Table 3) reveal that coke deposition is favored by higher-concentrations of oxygenates in the reaction medium (corresponding to a lower-space time).…”
Section: Consideration Of Deactivation In the Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There are several review articles outlining various aspects of catalyst poisoning [9,10], however, models that deal with catalyst poisoning are really scarce in literature. The general practice in modeling catalyst poisoning is to express the activity, i.e the ratio of true rate to the initial rate, as a function of time and poison concentration [11,12,13,14]. This work appears to be the first attempt to model sulfur poisoning on Ni catalyst using a detailed kinetic model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory that the acidic site deterioration of the catalyst affects each of the individual steps of the kinetic scheme equally is based on the verification made in a previous work (Gayubo et al, 1996a). There it was shown that the same acidic sites take part in the individual steps by which light olefins form and on their transformation into hydrocarbons of gasoline in the boiling point range.…”
Section: Deactivation Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The feed-reaction-analysis system is controlled by a computer routine. Calculation of the weight fraction of the lumps of oxygenates (methanol and dimethyl ether), of light olefins (ethylene, propyiene, and butenes), and of the rest of the products is carried out using a program in FORTRAN, which is based on the composition of each individual product obtained in the chromatographic runs (Benito et al, 1996a).…”
Section: Reaction -Regeneration Equipment and Product Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation