1991
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.43.7105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration field in traveling-wave and stationary convection in fluid mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structural changes that occur with growing χ can be observed experimentally in topview and even better in sideview shadowgraph intensity distributions [20,10,12]. The sideviews in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The structural changes that occur with growing χ can be observed experimentally in topview and even better in sideview shadowgraph intensity distributions [20,10,12]. The sideviews in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The convective amplitude of the fast (slow) TW is small (large) while the amplitude of its concentration contrast is large (small). The fast stable TWs have so far remained unnoticed in experiments [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and numerical simulations [14,15]. They develop with increasing Soret coupling via a saddle node bifurcation out of a dent in the subcritically bifurcating unstable TW branch.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Especially, if the binary mixture shows a non-vanishing Soret effect, i.e., if concentration currents are driven by temperature gradients, the dynamics of the system are expected to change due to a coupling of the temperature field into the concentration field. For the classical Rayleigh-Bénard system without porous medium, there has been a large body of work dealing with binary mixtures under the influence of the Soret effect (Eaton et al (1991); Barten et al (1995); Huke. & Lücke (2002); Le Gal et al (1985); Dominguez-Lerma et al (1995); Barten et al (1989); Schöpf & Zimmermann (1993); Knobloch & Moore (1988); Cross & Kim (1988); Kolodner et al (1986); Fütterer & Lücke (2002); Touiri et al (1996); Ahlers & Rehberg (1986); Walden et al (1985)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%